Selling two of my lenses . Legendary for portrait Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS with great bokeh and smoothie focus . Nikkor 28mm 2.8 pancake is tiny and compact . It's very nice to take landscape or black and white photo with amazing contrast. Contact: 0408747444 (SMS , englantia) or htrung1311@gmail.com Price without shipping fee: Nikkor 105mm f1.8 with filter Kenko UV= 450e Nikkor 28mm f2.8 =100e If you buy both of them so i offer i will pay shipping fee for them . Nikkor 105mm f1.8 Nikkor 28mm f2.8
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake I wouldn't be nitpicking, but the 28 mm wideangle is by its construction and design a very typical and traditional retrocfocus wideangle... There is nothing pancakish about it. Tikkis
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake [QUOTE> [/QUOTE] A little correction is needed: In picture I see Nikon Series E lens. It is not a Nikkor lens. Beginner's level Series E was introduced with Nikon EM. Quite common mistake. You can ignore my post. Everyone know this without my explanation.. http://mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/emfgfg20/eserieslenses/htmls/283550mm.htm
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake Please explain an pancake! Is it really a certain construction, or maybe any subjectively little sized objective lens? (I think in SLR ALL wideangles must be retrofocus construction due the space needed for a mirror)
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake Since the post is already at the top... I think pancake lenses are just small lenses, so I guess is subjective whether or not a lens qualifies for that name. Therefore, it's subjective if even the Panasonic 20mm F1.7 made for the MFT system is a "true" pancake given the small sensor size ( = "could the lens be made even smaller?"). It is true, however, that the most popular pancake lenses are simple in lens design. Here's a quote from our trusty friend Wikipedia: [QUOTE> [/QUOTE] Of course, in the case of Wikipedia, we cannot be sure if the writer knew what they were talking about
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake You eat pancakes or what ? Now try to eat that Nikon E-series objective - taste like a shit (or plastic) ! ... "I've Got the Brains" -Andy Kaufman -E
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake Because lack of coating of 28mm f2.8 so it have the realer and more contrast when you take black and white color pictures.
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake Lack of coating? ??? Quoted here: http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/htmls/glossery_nikon.htm Nikon Integrated Coating. In years past, the reflection of light off the surfaces of individual lens elements and the absorption of light into the glass itself caused a multitude of problems, including ghost images, flare, poor contrast, and unfaithful color rendition. Great strides forward were made in the early 1970's when various camera companies began applying multiple layers of microscopically thin anti-reflective materials to the lens elements. However, unlike other manufacturers who indiscriminately apply the same number of coatings to each and every lens element regardless of its type or the glass used, Nikon's multilayer coating process is integrated into the design of the particular lens. Just the right number of coatings are applied to each lens element in a vacuum chamber to match the lens type and glass used. The result is a dramatic increase in image contrast and actual light transmission and a corresponding reduction in flare caused by internal reflections. But more importantly, uniform color balance from lens to lens is achieved throughout the entire Nikkor and Nikon Series E line-up. Yes, Nikon Integrated Coating (NIC) is not an easy process, but then optical excellence demands nothing less. http://mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/emfgfg20/eserieslenses/htmls/283550mm.htm Technical Highlights: * Wide picture coverage of 74° is convenient for general photography. * Exceptionally light - weighs only 155 grams. * Nikon Integrated Coating is applied to maintain high contrast and faithful color rendition. *Uses popular 52mm filters. * Suitable for general photographic situations, such as candid, landscapes, and travel or just use your creativity in all aspect of photography. I think your version is very first one without metal ring in the middle. I see it high prised (100€) becauce I have seen those sold for 25-50€. (Thus I can't compare - some of them been much used and weared.) 105/1.8 is friendly prised. (450€)
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake Here is some picture from lens (it's not my picture but from the group who like this lens alot ): http://www.flickr.com/groups/nikon28e/pool/with/5502548261/ My lens is Nikon series E not Nikon AIS series E so it dont have the metal ring. Just found a link of one shop around 1 month ago : https://phototronic.24secure.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=125&products_id=896 Its price is around 100e because it's in good condition and it have a good price for collector and good quality photo taken by it also.
Vs: M:Nikkor 105mm f1.8 AIS ja Nikkor 28mm f2.8 pancake Yes, it is not very unusual highly prized. http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160559896199 http://shop.ebay.de/?_from=R40&_trksid=p5197.m570.l1313&_nkw=Nikon+E+28&_sacat=See-All-Categories http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=150574652362 I supposed they all are AI-S as natural, without "rabbit ears". Perhaps I don't have enough Nikon knowledge. (AI-S have an extra hole on surface of bayonet. No.5. Look at my last ebay link too: Ai-S type without metal ring, serial 1799006...)